Difference between revisions of "Appeal to False Authority"
| Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
he might be, he might not be, regardless hes not an expert on that topic | he might be, he might not be, regardless hes not an expert on that topic | ||
| − | so his opinion is irrelevant, this is also just hearsay until | + | so his opinion is irrelevant, this is also just hearsay about some guy's opinion, until the evidence is presented. |
#2 | #2 | ||
| Line 51: | Line 51: | ||
he might be an expert, he might also be a liar, what would prove it true however is evidence | he might be an expert, he might also be a liar, what would prove it true however is evidence | ||
| − | |||
==Other Examples== | ==Other Examples== | ||
Latest revision as of 22:17, 15 February 2022
Return to Logical Fallacies
Contents
Description
Using an alleged authority as evidence in your argument when the authority is not really an authority on the facts relevant to the argument. As the audience, allowing an irrelevant authority to add credibility to the claim being made. Also see the Appeal to Authority
Names
Appeal to False Authority
(also known as: appeal to doubtful authority, appeal to dubious authority, appeal to improper authority, appeal to inappropriate authority, appeal to irrelevant authority, appeal to misplaced authority, appeal to unqualified authority, argument from false authority)
Types
Inductive or Irrelevant argument, Informal Fallacy
Logical Form
According to person 1 (who offers little or no expertise on Y being true), Y is true. Therefore, Y is true.
According to person 1 (who offers little or no expertise on Y being true), Y is true. Therefore, Y is more likely to be true.
Expert A gives her view on issue B. Expert A’s area of expertise has little or nothing to do with issue B. Expert A’s opinion influences how people feel about issue B.
Examples
Discord Examples
- 1
"My Uncle is a government official, he told me the earth is a globe."
he might be, he might not be, regardless hes not an expert on that topic so his opinion is irrelevant, this is also just hearsay about some guy's opinion, until the evidence is presented.
- 2
"According to my school teacher who is an expert on the globe, the globe is true."
the teacher has neither confirmed or denied that claim, they are only teaching you what they learned, what would prove it true is evidence.
- 3
"my mothers uncle best friends boyfriend is an astronaut, he is an expert on outer space so outer space is true."
he might be an expert, he might also be a liar, what would prove it true however is evidence
Other Examples
- 1
"My 5th-grade teacher once told me that girls would go crazy for boys if they learn how to dance. Therefore, if you want to make the ladies go crazy for you, learn to dance."
Even if the 5th-grade teacher were an expert on relationships, her belief about what makes girls “go crazy” for boys is speculative, or perhaps circumstantial, at best. In other words, the teacher's expertise is in dance, not on the psychology of attraction.
- 2
"The Pope told me that priests could turn bread and wine into Jesus’ body and blood. The Pope is not a liar. Therefore, priests really can do this."
The Pope may believe what he says, and perhaps the Pope is not a liar, but the Pope is not an authority on the fact that the bread and wine are actually transformed into Jesus’ body and blood.
- 3
Dr. Dean, TV’s hottest new psychologist, says that coffee enemas are the “fountain of youth.” Get me that coffee enema!
Assuming Dr. Dean is actually a licensed psychologist, that does not qualify him to give advice about non-psychology related issues such as coffee enemas. Like the colon, Dr. Dean is most likely full of... obligate anaerobes. Extending his expertise from psychology to issues of the colon is fallacious.
- 4
My accountant says that within the next 90 days, the president will be impeached! So we should take this claim seriously!
Unless the accountant has some inside information to the presidency, her expertise in accounting has little to do with the current administration, political, and constitutional law.
context matters, there is an Exception:
Don’t pigeonhole people into certain areas of expertise. A medical doctor can also be an expert in sewing. A fly-fisherman can also be an expert in law. And a patent clerk can also be an expert in quantum mechanics.
Weakness
the proof is in the pudding so to speak, in the evidence presented and arguments made, not peoples previous or current occupation.
Extra information
Tip: Beware of your confirmation bias. You may want a person to be an authority on the topic, and this desire will result in your seeking out confirming information and ignoring conflicting information.
Ref Rulings
for quick and easy fallacy moderation
Objection Stands
Objection Stands. That is an appeal to false Authority fallacy
an alleged authority was used as evidence in your argument when the alleged authority is not really an authority on the facts relevant to the argument.
Please reformulate the argument without this fallacy or concede and move on. failure to do either and you'll forfeit the debate. Please continue.
Objection Removed
Objection Removed. That is not an appeal to false authority fallacy, that was a legitimate citation from a subject matter expert.
an appeal to false authority means Using an alleged authority as evidence in your argument when the authority is not really an authority on the facts relevant to the argument.
Please reformulate the counter argument without the fallacy fallacy or concede and move on. failure to do either and you'll forfeit the debate. Please continue.
