Difference between revisions of "Logical Fallacies"

From Flat Earth Community Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 19: Line 19:
 
# Slippery Slope
 
# Slippery Slope
 
#
 
#
 +
 +
 +
==References==
 +
 +
Hurley, Patrick J. A Concise Introduction to Logic. Wadsworth, 1988.

Revision as of 13:58, 1 May 2020

One of the reasons that an unverifiable globe model with impossible dimensions has been able to be perpetuated for so long is that there is a serious lack of training in systematic logic. At one time, formal training in logic was an accepted and important part of classical education. It should surprise no one familiar with current world affairs that it is advantageous for those hoarding power and resources to keep the masses uneducated and their minds untrained. By learning about and pointing out the errors in logic known as logical fallacies when they occur, we can retrain our minds to think more logically and clearly about the nature of our world and other important issues.

Informal Fallacies

Informal fallacies can be determined only through analyzing the content of the argument, as opposed to formal fallacies which relate to the form of the argument.

  1. Appeal to Force (Argumentum ad Baculum: Appeal to the "Stick")
  2. Appeal to Pity (Argumentum as Misericordiam)
  3. Appeal to the People (Argumentum ad Populum)
  4. Argument Against the Person (Argumentum ad Hominem)
  5. Dicto Simpliciter
  6. Straw Man
  7. Missing the Point (Ignoratio Elenchi)
  8. Red Herring
  9. Appeal to Authority (Argumentum as Verecundiam)
  10. Appeal to Ignorance (Argumentum as Ignorantiam)
  11. Hasty Generalization (Converse Accident)
  12. False Cause
  13. Slippery Slope


References

Hurley, Patrick J. A Concise Introduction to Logic. Wadsworth, 1988.