Difference between revisions of "Frequently Asked Questions"
(10 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
<div class="mw-collapsible mw-collapsed" id="mw-customcollapsible-myToggle4"> | <div class="mw-collapsible mw-collapsed" id="mw-customcollapsible-myToggle4"> | ||
<div class="toccolours mw-collapsible-content">A: This spurious claim that the Earth is too big too verify the curve is sometimes claimed by pseudoscientific entertainers like [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U-f63VAwZpo Neil deGrasse Tyson] when it suits their narrative. If the actual geometry of the alleged ball shape is analyzed however, an intellectually honest person can mathematically determine that if the Earth were a globe of the dimensions claimed, we would be able to see the effects of curvature with the naked eye, and certainly would be able to see it in an airplane or using high powered optical equipment. To the contrary, numerous long distance observations clearly demonstrate that the curvature predicted by the mainstream model of roughly [https://www.omnicalculator.com/physics/earth-curvature 8 inches per mile squared] is never seen or measured anywhere on Earth. These myriad counterexamples disprove the WGS-84 globe model. Using the radius of 3959 miles and other dimensions claimed by mainstream pseudoscience, we can easily determine that the claimed size of the Earth is NOT too big to verify curvature, if said curvature actually existed in objective reality. [[Observations | read more...]] </div> | <div class="toccolours mw-collapsible-content">A: This spurious claim that the Earth is too big too verify the curve is sometimes claimed by pseudoscientific entertainers like [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U-f63VAwZpo Neil deGrasse Tyson] when it suits their narrative. If the actual geometry of the alleged ball shape is analyzed however, an intellectually honest person can mathematically determine that if the Earth were a globe of the dimensions claimed, we would be able to see the effects of curvature with the naked eye, and certainly would be able to see it in an airplane or using high powered optical equipment. To the contrary, numerous long distance observations clearly demonstrate that the curvature predicted by the mainstream model of roughly [https://www.omnicalculator.com/physics/earth-curvature 8 inches per mile squared] is never seen or measured anywhere on Earth. These myriad counterexamples disprove the WGS-84 globe model. Using the radius of 3959 miles and other dimensions claimed by mainstream pseudoscience, we can easily determine that the claimed size of the Earth is NOT too big to verify curvature, if said curvature actually existed in objective reality. [[Observations | read more...]] </div> | ||
+ | |||
</div> | </div> | ||
Line 49: | Line 50: | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
− | '''Q: If the Earth is not spherical, why do boats disappear over the horizon? | + | <div class="mw-customtoggle-myToggle7" style="cursor:pointer; color:blue">'''Q: Why would they lie?''' [+/-] Click here to toggle]</div> |
− | ''' | + | <div class="mw-collapsible mw-collapsed" id="mw-customcollapsible-myToggle7"> |
+ | <div class="toccolours mw-collapsible-content">A: This is an Appeal to Motive [[Logical Fallacies|Fallacy]] and irrelevant to the question of whether or not the globe shape claim can be verified. </div> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <div class="mw-customtoggle-myToggle8" style="cursor:pointer; color:blue">'''Q: What if you as a flat earther were taken up to "outer space" and shown that the Earth is a globe. Would you accept it then?''' [+/-] Click here to toggle]</div> | ||
+ | <div class="mw-collapsible mw-collapsed" id="mw-customcollapsible-myToggle8"> | ||
+ | <div class="toccolours mw-collapsible-content">A: This is an Escape to the Future [[Logical Fallacies|Fallacy]] and irrelevant to the question of whether or not the globe shape claim can be verified. </div> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <div class="mw-customtoggle-myToggle9" style="cursor:pointer; color:blue">'''Q: If the Earth is not spherical, why do boats disappear over the horizon? | ||
+ | '''[+/-] Click here to toggle]</div> | ||
+ | <div class="mw-collapsible mw-collapsed" id="mw-customcollapsible-myToggle9"> | ||
+ | <div class="toccolours mw-collapsible-content">A: Boats can give the appearance of disappearing over the horizon due to natural limitations in human vision and perspective. A high powered zoom camera, binoculars, or other optical instruments can bring the "disappeared" boat back into view, thus demonstrating that the boat indeed remained on the non-globular planar surface of reality and did not disappear behind an imaginary curve. See also [[Affirming_the_consequent|Affirming the Consequent]]</div> | ||
− | |||
'''Q: Didn't Eratosthenes use sticks and shadows to prove that the Earth is ball-shaped?''' | '''Q: Didn't Eratosthenes use sticks and shadows to prove that the Earth is ball-shaped?''' | ||
Line 85: | Line 101: | ||
A: [coming soon] | A: [coming soon] | ||
− | |||
− | |||
'''Q: What is underneath the Earth?''' | '''Q: What is underneath the Earth?''' | ||
Line 93: | Line 107: | ||
'''Q: Why don't you flat earthers...[get on a boat and go south, start a GoFundMe to launch a weather balloon, take this random plane trip, etc.]''' | '''Q: Why don't you flat earthers...[get on a boat and go south, start a GoFundMe to launch a weather balloon, take this random plane trip, etc.]''' | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
A: [coming soon] | A: [coming soon] |
Latest revision as of 13:54, 20 June 2023
When we leave these presuppositions behind, what we actually observe on Earth is that the sun illuminates different parts of the plane at different times. If you take a flashlight and point it at your bedroom floor at night, it only illuminates one part of the carpet at a time, and the rest of the floor is in shadow. In the same way, a close and local sun circling overhead would only illuminate one part of the world before moving on to another part. Here is a possible demonstration of how that might look, based on what we actually observe: Demonstration of Sun's Partial Illumination of a Flat Plane The globe model requires complicated mathematical calculations based on inaccurate numbers and presuppositions. Indeed it is much more difficult to explain the path of the sun when using the hypothetical globe model than it is to explain the reality of what we observe on a flat and stationary Earth.
read more ...
Q: Didn't Eratosthenes use sticks and shadows to prove that the Earth is ball-shaped?
A: [coming soon]
Q: How do you have time zones without the globe model?
A: [coming soon]
Q: If the Earth measures flat, why can't we see forever?
A: [coming soon]
Q: Does gravity exist?
A: [coming soon]
Q: Don't eclipses prove the globe?
A: [coming soon]
Q: Who cares if it's a globe or flat? Why does it matter?
A: [coming soon}
Q: If the Earth is flat, how do you explain the Coriolis effect?
A: [coming soon]
Q: What is underneath the Earth?
A: [coming soon]
Q: Why don't you flat earthers...[get on a boat and go south, start a GoFundMe to launch a weather balloon, take this random plane trip, etc.]
A: [coming soon]